Thread
| re: The Rating System joey 20 Aug 08 12:50PM | Thread Closed |
yes, that was a bullshit thing for the mod's to do -- as though starr wasn't a strong enough poet to survive a game like this -- and what the post did say was that the unknown has a problem -- we're mature writers here -- we like to see little kid's show and talk about their problems because it shows something of the problem we all have of conceptualizing and working out our dealings with the world. the unknown's comment was 'literature', whether some semi-literate mod thinks so or not, and i'm sure starr wouldn't mind the comment -- he knows he's one of the strongest writers here, an knows that the best way to react to a comment like this is to simply write about it.
what's wrong with these moderators??? they never talk about theory of poetry site, and what the actual dynamics of a place like this are and how important that is for real writers. they're just into being just another mindless dynamic -- mod as, 'unknown'.
> if the mods are going to delete the post about starr i think it only
> fair that the post about mong and fract be deleted as well.
|
| re: The Rating System unknown 20 Aug 08 12:51PM | Thread Closed |
> I disagree it is fair comment, check the facts out for yourself.
>
> Go give yourself loads of tens for stupidity.
prove it
|
|---|
| re: The Rating System unknown 20 Aug 08 12:53PM | Thread Closed |
talk about not knowing how to read. join in when you understand more, joey.
> yes, that was a bullshit thing for the mod's to do -- as though starr
> wasn't a strong enough poet to survive a game like this -- and what
> the post did say was that the unknown has a problem -- we're mature
> writers here -- we like to see little kid's show and talk about their
> problems because it shows something of the problem we all have of
> conceptualizing and working out our dealings with the world. the
> unknown's comment was 'literature', whether some semi-literate mod
> thinks so or not, and i'm sure starr wouldn't mind the comment -- he
> knows he's one of the strongest writers here, an knows that the best
> way to react to a comment like this is to simply write about it.
>
> what's wrong with these moderators??? they never talk about theory of
> poetry site, and what the actual dynamics of a place like this are and
> how important that is for real writers. they're just into being just
> another mindless dynamic -- mod as, 'unknown'.
>
>
> > if the mods are going to delete the post about starr i think it only
> > fair that the post about mong and fract be deleted as well.
|
| re: The Rating System joey 20 Aug 08 12:56PM | Thread Closed |
semi-verbal word worker, what have i missed? or, can you write it out? maybe my post said more than you can read in one day? or is 'understanding' a kind of ur-cultural thing -- sorry, i mean something in the blood, like being aryan, where you instinctively know who's tacky and who's 'upper class'?
> talk about not knowing how to read. join in when you understand more,
> joey.
>
> > yes, that was a bullshit thing for the mod's to do -- as though
> starr
> > wasn't a strong enough poet to survive a game like this -- and what
> > the post did say was that the unknown has a problem -- we're mature
> > writers here -- we like to see little kid's show and talk about
> their
> > problems because it shows something of the problem we all have of
> > conceptualizing and working out our dealings with the world. the
> > unknown's comment was 'literature', whether some semi-literate
> mod
> > thinks so or not, and i'm sure starr wouldn't mind the comment --
> he
> > knows he's one of the strongest writers here, an knows that the
> best
> > way to react to a comment like this is to simply write about it.
> >
> > what's wrong with these moderators??? they never talk about theory
> of
> > poetry site, and what the actual dynamics of a place like this are
> and
> > how important that is for real writers. they're just into being
> just
> > another mindless dynamic -- mod as, 'unknown'.
> >
> >
> > > if the mods are going to delete the post about starr i think it
> only
> > > fair that the post about mong and fract be deleted as well.
|
|---|
| re: The Rating System unknown 20 Aug 08 1:05PM | Thread Closed |
> > I disagree it is fair comment, check the facts out for yourself.
> >
> > Go give yourself loads of tens for stupidity.
>
> prove it
There are cheats in every walk of life. They get away with it due the stupidity or apathy of those around them.
One would imagine that part of the responsibility of a moderator would to be aware of such activities and take appropriate action; it would at least give the rating system some semblance of credibility if such practices were frowned upon.
|
| re: The Rating System joey 20 Aug 08 1:11PM | Thread Closed |
you're cheating, unknown, by not giving us an intellectual history -- all unknowns type alike -- the alphabet they share -- but some unknowns are smart enough and good enough writers to stand behind their work and not be so sissy about it all. give us some semblance of credibility -- i'm really not understanding why you guys do the 'we will punish you after the revolution' and also 'we want you to admit that we're the ones with heart here', when it looks like all you want is to cut ours out.
> > > I disagree it is fair comment, check the facts out for yourself.
> > >
> > > Go give yourself loads of tens for stupidity.
> >
> > prove it
>
> There are cheats in every walk of life. They get away with it due the
> stupidity or apathy of those around them.
>
> One would imagine that part of the responsibility of a moderator would
> to be aware of such activities and take appropriate action; it would
> at least give the rating system some semblance of credibility if such
> practices were frowned upon.
|
|---|
| re: The Rating System AlchemiA 20 Aug 08 1:14PM | Thread Closed |
God does not play dice and the dice are loaded -- it's like that in duality where you have dialectical systems which cannot be sinTheorized in this existDance -- nevertheless the crit is the wit of it -- Economics is a loaded dice system and so is the Rating System based on numeric supremacy a darWinian ArtIfact-- it's about the haves and the want nots playing in the pome or gracing the page with their ponder and reaches without the grieVentings and moral-unrealistic teach us --
|
| re: The Rating System unknown 20 Aug 08 1:17PM | Thread Closed |
We have the ludicrous situation of mongrol who acquires many more ten’s than favourable comments.
A most peculiar phenomenon for a poetry site. When it is pointed out he immediately withdraws his work in order to hide the evidence. How strange!
|
|---|
| re: The Rating System unknown 20 Aug 08 1:22PM | Thread Closed |
that was MY comment about starrlite. And I stand by it. isabelle always 9s and 10s starrlite and a few (smirk) chosen others even though she says she never gives more than an 8
oh cad-u-cus! oh cad-u-cus!
where was i?
and starrlite plays the same game except he always does his white bo shout out
peace-out dude- three thumbs into you! # 1 spot again
but i<3 when starrlite does that 'cause it always brings the poem down.
very very funny business.
anyway if you're not part of the kissy-pussy crowd
good luck to you and if you are you'll never get good honest critique from the pussy-kissy clique so your poems will remain as crappy as ever
a very angry non-teen.
i could mention lotsa names but i won't.
|
| re: The Rating System unknown 20 Aug 08 1:32PM | Thread Closed |
Lets be fair to dear old Isabelle, she has never ever given me anything but ones.
But they make wonderful soup.
|
|---|
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Next
|
|