Thread
| re: The Rating System unknown 20 Aug 08 2:00PM | Thread Closed |
W
> >
> > You merely need to register several names on PC from different
> > computers and award yourself plenty of ten’s (Mongrol style.)
>
>
> I'm still waiting for you to come up with some evidence of this Mor.
> As it's not true there won't be any, so I really want to see you
> try.
>
> :)
>
>
> ~ Mong
Why did you remove your poetry so quickly when it was suggested that you were up to your old tricks again in registering fake ten’s.
There is more than Mor aware of your deceit on PC.
|
| re: The Rating System joey 20 Aug 08 2:01PM | Thread Closed |
jee, this really sounds like a deep discussion you had. like, talking as though you really cared about poetry itself and it wasn't a vanity thing with you -- and during your discussion you talked about why a poem has to be a poem and not something else, and the problem for people who know 'book report' and 'poem' and think that anything they post that isn't a book report must be a poem. and i'm sure you talked about the 'subjective' word -- the 's' word, and maybe opened the discussion beyond the popular mechanics view that subjective means anything that's not your own opinion, and that objectivity in a poetry pit simply isn't possible because each real poet is inventing poetry from the ground up and has, in that moment of creation, no real notion that there are other poetry's at all, and that the fear that people have -- of negation of their identity here, as writer of poetry, is a jerk-reaction and necessary, but built on the notion that they're a poet just because they've written a poem -- when it's obvious that when, i, for instance, post in this forum that i'm writing cloggy prose and not in the poet space at all -- that prose, even from the most gifted poet, and poet in the mode, is still not poetry and still only works by reference and not concept creation. i'm sure this came up in your dialog because how you put your prose together to say this reflects such a self-conscious and intelligent mode of thinking, and not just a hammered 'mee think so right' point of view, which offers nothing but itself -- terminal -- and doesn't evoke concept and doesn't force the reader to think about the concept of rating and poetry itself beyond, 'they post 10! no! bad-bad!'. i like that about your post.
get better friends.
> My friend and I, both long-time members, recently discussed the topic
> of "The Rating System". My friend rates regularly, while I choose
> not to rate at all. However, we agreed that the "System" could use
> some refinement.
>
> We agree that far too many here are far too liberal with the
> assignment of "10" scores. Also, "1" is a score which is rarely
> applicable, but can be assigned as often and to as many poems as one
> wishes.
>
> To adjust the "System", we suggest the imposition of only allowing a
> member to assign a certain number of certain scores during each
> "rolling seven-day period". It may serve the equity of the overall
> ratings were a member only allowed to assign as many "10"s or "1"s
> per week as they are to post poems. Currently, that would mean two
> "10"s, and two "1"s. After that, perhaps a few "9"s and a few
> "2"s, several "8"s and "3"s, and then less limited "4"s
> through "7"s.
>
> This would cause a member to be much more judicious in their
> assignment of a much more highly prized "10", or conversely, their
> assignment of the dreaded "1".
|
|---|
| re: The Rating System unknown 20 Aug 08 2:03PM | Thread Closed |
Jealousy. :-) And actually I'm 1/2 white, but you don't know me, so get over your shit. If you'd like to come up to Maine, I'd be happy to talk about your problem with you though. You're unknown because you don't have the balls to identify yourself. That makes you a coward. Show me who you are and stop being such a little mouthy pussy.
|
| re: The Rating System Mongrol 20 Aug 08 2:03PM | Thread Closed |
> well mongrol, i hate to embarrass you but EVERYONE who pays attention
> has noticed your CRUSH on mor even though he biatch slaps you
> something terrible.
Nope, not embarrassed as there's no (lol) crush. :)
Fun and entertainment slapping him around for fun sure... and not noticed any 'biatch' slapping coming from the old testicle.... a lot of bluff, guff and stuff... something terrible... mor...
~ Mong
|
|---|
| re: The Rating System unknown 20 Aug 08 2:03PM | Thread Closed |
that snot joey talking that's Mr. Michael Bauer.
no fair!
|
| re: The Rating System Mongrol 20 Aug 08 2:04PM | Thread Closed |
>
> Why did you remove your poetry so quickly when it was suggested that
> you were up to your old tricks again in registering fake ten’s.
> There is more than Mor aware of your deceit on PC.
Name one, and sorry nope, barking up the wrong tree ;)
~ Mong
|
|---|
| re: The Rating System starr 20 Aug 08 2:05PM | Thread Closed |
Yep. Just signin' my name to the above post.
|
| re: The Rating System unknown 20 Aug 08 2:05PM | Thread Closed |
Mor likes 'em young it seems, got a real thing for 'tender schoolboy' mongs, a bit Glitter about it, if you catch my drift.
|
|---|
| re: The Rating System joey 20 Aug 08 2:07PM | Thread Closed |
'joey' came up because mikebauer got banned from the site last year or whenever. what was great is that i wrote the same thing, in the same style, but nobody really reads carefully enough here to tell, and when 'joey' said nice little things, he was praised. 'nice little things', a mint on a pillow, when what's going to happen between the sheets is what most people here are interested in.
"sleep, after long chatting..." :)
> that snot joey talking that's Mr. Michael Bauer.
> no fair!
|
| re: The Rating System unknown 20 Aug 08 2:10PM | Thread Closed |
yah
but are you unattractive? oops! wrong thread!
|
|---|
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Next
|
|