Thread
| re: i only read high-class poetry netskyIam 26 Sep 08 6:40PM | Thread Closed |
"So, is it addictive personality, do you think, doc, if i post more than 3 posts a day on an internet site?"
No. I suppose that we two have only this much in common: we like/must beg for attention.
It is an ego-thing. Ego is vital. Some egos are healthy. Some egos are sick, twisted, not working for the common wheal.
|
| re: i only read high-class poetry 1994 26 Sep 08 6:41PM | Thread Closed |
that stings.
and bothers.
i used to admire you.
suddenly though
you sound like my mother.
> so, is it addictive personality, do you think, doc, if i post more
> than 3 posts a day on an internet site?
>
> 'intellectual' means that you go in for playing inside concepts and
> remodeling them, redesigning them for other realms. that's a super
> hard thing to walk yourself into, and i don't expect you to. i do
> think, since this is all so trailer-trash, that i must have had
> something more going on in me than you've got in that i was able to
> walk myself out of trailer park and into mostly free and creative
> thought. what bothers me is that you didn't bother to, and you can't
> have had a harder childhood than mine, unless you made it so yourself,
> and that you can't know how really much work goes in to dis-informing
> yourself out of what everyone knows... you can't just clone my
> phrasing and talk like me, to me, and expect to win an argument. i'm
> the one that invents arguments.
|
|---|
| re: i only read high-class poetry joey 26 Sep 08 6:41PM | Thread Closed |
they ain't got four roses, nezky.
|
| re: i only read high-class poetry joey 26 Sep 08 6:43PM | Thread Closed |
do you really think i want your admiration? i want you to be free of needing admiration in anything but the smooth gesture you make when you curve down a page of text.
> that stings.
> and bothers.
> i used to admire you.
> suddenly though
> you sound like my mother.
>
>
> > so, is it addictive personality, do you think, doc, if i post more
> > than 3 posts a day on an internet site?
> >
> > 'intellectual' means that you go in for playing inside concepts
> and
> > remodeling them, redesigning them for other realms. that's a super
> > hard thing to walk yourself into, and i don't expect you to. i do
> > think, since this is all so trailer-trash, that i must have had
> > something more going on in me than you've got in that i was able to
> > walk myself out of trailer park and into mostly free and creative
> > thought. what bothers me is that you didn't bother to, and you
> can't
> > have had a harder childhood than mine, unless you made it so
> yourself,
> > and that you can't know how really much work goes in to
> dis-informing
> > yourself out of what everyone knows... you can't just clone my
> > phrasing and talk like me, to me, and expect to win an argument.
> i'm
> > the one that invents arguments.
|
|---|
| re: i only read high-class poetry Mongrol 26 Sep 08 6:47PM | Thread Closed |
> mon, i don't think you've ever talked to an intellectual before.
am I talking to one now?
what you think and what you know are quite separate things it seems joey.
simply because I don't care to display myself, nor what I know in any fashion other than direct language, you assume.
there's a reason why assume begins with ass.
the rest of your commentary is dismissed as ill-informed and defensive rhetoric, with a purpose, but not one I care to indulge in for the sake of your vanity.
you got that part yeh?
I got your concept alright joey... but your egotism refuses to let you begin to realise how unimportant it is... partly because you have said it, and mostly because it is wasted air.
> you're shotgunning me with some kind of mr. rational argument, and it's irrational
this is where you continue to make a mistake...
> none the less, and for all this writing of yours, you still haven't told me what you think 'isn't' a poem. what isn't a poem?#
Yes I did joey, but true to form, you read what you think was written and not what was actually written, and then read into it what is not there.
|
| re: i only read high-class poetry 1994 26 Sep 08 6:52PM | Thread Closed |
> do you really think i want your admiration? i want you to be free of
> needing admiration in anything but the smooth gesture you make when
> you curve down a page of text.
not what i was going for, sweetheart.
was simply stating my change of heart.
|
|---|
| re: i only read high-class poetry joey 26 Sep 08 6:52PM | Thread Closed |
do i really need this? i suppose it's punishment for stepping on a pill-bug when i was 6. you're very linear.
|
| re: i only read high-class poetry joey 26 Sep 08 6:53PM | Thread Closed |
my thought might be that you should get a new mother.
> > do you really think i want your admiration? i want you to be free of
> > needing admiration in anything but the smooth gesture you make when
> > you curve down a page of text.
>
> not what i was going for, sweetheart.
> was simply stating my change of heart.
|
|---|
| re: i only read high-class poetry 1994 26 Sep 08 7:00PM | Thread Closed |
> my thought might be that you should get a new mother.
my thoughts for years.
but i've learned a lot from her.
and a lot from you.
and i'm content enough not to spout it all here.
there's a lot in me. i'm not a brag though.
|
| re: i only read high-class poetry Mongrol 26 Sep 08 7:00PM | Thread Closed |
> i'm the one that invents arguments.
Not really, as invention would describe something not thought of before, or at least a variation of concept internally rearranged to supply entirely new processes of thought.
I've not seen this yet, well very rarely, which is why I have not engaged in any depth, there are paths well trodden here, if you care to spot the footprints.
What occurs is a mostly one sided tryst of declaring being misunderstood as the concepts provided, hinted at, alluded too, laid one layer at a time, is beyond the intellectual wits of those reading it.
I know this post will again appeal to your vanity as you think it is a directors prompt to act ... not so.
Considering the Original Post - the OP - the opinion promoted is still moot.
|
|---|
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next
|
|