poetry critical

online poetry workshop



the most striking thing
mikkirat

You've made no mistake.
 1
 
 
You're quite right,
 2
for it is clearly tattooed on your forehead,
 3
and blue ink
 4
reads silently.
 5
 
 
Over the years, you've concluded that
 6
mirrors lie;
 7
and similarly, photographs
 8
are only slightly more honest than that,
 9
but so much these days seems blurry
 10
and obscure,
 11
you have trouble trusting,
 12
or believing circumstantial evidence.
 13
It is obvious when you walk downtown.
 14
Your latest lover sees it when you sleep.
 15
Your mother always knew it was there,
 16
but said nothing.
 17
 
 
You've tried to erase it with clenched fists,
 18
but oftentimes, it is
 19
the most striking thing about you,
 20
the thing
 21
which people remember forever.
 22
 
 
Elsewhere, the latest murder remains unsolved.
 23
Someone sees Jesus in a bakery window.
 24
An old man dies in his bedclothes.
 25
Two lovers have tired of each other on the train to Trieste,
 26
and here, for that mark on your forehead,
 27
you cannot sleep.
 28

26 Oct 05

Rated 10 (9.5) by 2 users.
Active (2): 10, 10
Inactive (2): 6, 9

(define the words in this poem)
(28 more poems by this author)

(4 users consider this poem a favorite)



Add A Comment:
Enter the following text to post as unknown: captcha

Comments:

It is still more wonderful to read in the morning waiting for the world's other "unknown" to rise in the sky.  Thanks for the taste and the unidentifiable spice.
 — slancho

You're welcome, my dear.
I made some substantial revisions over coffee this morning, and hopefully it captures some of that blank staring frost-on-the-bathroom-window sense of early nightfalls after unfulfilling summers.  Hope you like it still.
 — mikkirat

This is fabulous Mikkirat, especially the last stanza, which is breathtaking.
 — kitkat

For some reason, I liked the original more, it read tighter to me and said more with less.  I suppose I don't want to be told as much as pointed in a direction ... Hmm, what am I trying to say really ... maybe simply that I hope that that "blank staring frost-on-the-bathroom-wondow sense" remembers to look forward to fulfilling winters.  Lines 10-13 make me shudder ...
m
 — slancho

Thank you both.  slancho my dear, I do hope the new uncertain element of lines 10-13 makes up for the more plain-spoken first stanza, and kitkat, thanks as well: for as easy as the last stanza reads, it took an astonishingly long time to write.  I'm glad you like it.
 — mikkirat

This is so wonderful. The cadence is superior. utterly fabulous
 — madderhatter

Yes, it reads better because of the plain-spoken first stanza
maria
 — slancho

i love this, especially lines 8-12. line 21 seems strange to me though, i might have just said "this". i do understand the repetition of "thing", and you know, keep it as you like it.
 — moonrise

madderhatter, thanks; I am always glad to see you.

moonrise, thanks for your comment.  While I probably will keep line 21 as is, it is always a risk to balance so much of a poem on a single word, or repetition.  I may merge it with the line which follows for the final edit.  I'm also glad you found lines 8-12 remarkable; one of the most difficult aspects of writing a poem like this is softening the poetic voice to where the reader "accepts" the relationship with the voice.  It is easy, as a writer, to go horribly wrong in this fashion, to tell the reader who he/she "is," and "what they are like"; it is easy to offend the reader, so the fact that you like these lines is immensely gratifying.
Thanks,
 — mikkirat

re-reading this on a gloomy morning, coffee cold long ago ... the most striking thing about this poem - swift, energetic and with a dash of intensity at the end, always.  Images arrive in quanta ...
thank you
Maria
 — slancho

DROOLS absolutely amazing.
 — shadowskiss

Mickey, it's nice to be able to read your stuff again. My main problem with this is the almost erractic behaviour of your line breaks. I know that you're pretty damn meticulous with your work, which is why I hesitate to question your line breaks. But they really let this down, in my opinion. Any chance of tidying them a little?
 — wendz

Wendy, thank you; it is good to see you again as well, if even for a short visit.
I might be able to merge some lines in stanzas 2 & 3, but I speak (and recite) rather slowly, and this pace is as close as I can get to how I would verbalize it.  Be a dear and let me know which ones seem most egregious to you, and I'll reevaluate them.
Thanks bunches,
 — mikkirat

this is exceptionally powerful and vivid, mikki.  i've always thought
that --despite how mainstream and common they've become--
tattoos are striking physical symbols.  they can be used metaphorically
or literally when used in conjecture with writing or painting or drawing.
i think that when tattoos are framed effectively, there isn't much else
that could go wrong with a piece of writing.  this one is no exception.
i love it.

best of luck,
midare.

ps: i was looking through the list of your poems!  did you delete one?  i think
it had to do with a mechanically-inclined girl and a guy who wrote in "supermarket
scriptures" if my mind isn't completely failing me.  it was one of my favorites!

pps: if you actually didn't write that one, i swear i'm not crazy.
 — midare

Thanks, midare.  I wish I could say my tattoos have held up to the passing years, but alas, they have not.

And no, you're not going crazy; the poem you recall is "the charge (a.k.a. rough physics)."  It ended up getting published in "The Other Side of Sorrow: Poets Speak Out about Conflict, War, and Peace" by the Poetry Society of New Hampshire Press.  As internet "publishing" is still a murky legal ground, and I'd rather not have any publishing, ownership or copyright issues, I removed it.  I'd be happy to e-mail you a copy if you'd like.

You've got quite a collection posted; have you been farming those out to journals as well?
 — mikkirat

I'd suggest changing for it is simply to 'it's.'
 — stateofmind

I'll consider that for line 3, stateofmind, but probably not for line 19.  The voice is meant to be a bit stentorian, a questionable authority, or maybe a nighttime phantasmic voice, both of which would be a bit more haughty and trying to impress with diction instead of using more natural and converstional "it's."  Still, I'll consider it for line 3.
Thanks,
 — mikkirat

0.499s